Gambling Ad Reform Delayed: Advocates Demand Action
The Australian Government’s plan to restrict gambling advertising during sporting events has been delayed indefinitely, with ministers offering conflicting explanations for the postponement. Advocacy groups and opposition leaders have criticised the government’s inaction, urging immediate reform to address gambling-related harm.
- Proposed restrictions on gambling ads delayed; no timeline provided.
- Ministers cited differing reasons for the postponement.
- Advocacy groups and opposition parties demand stronger action.
The reform bill, anticipated to be introduced in the final parliamentary sitting of the year, was notably absent. Competition Minister Andrew Leigh stated that insufficient Senate support hindered progress, citing a lack of bipartisan backing. Meanwhile, Sports Minister Anika Wells attributed the delay to the need for further refinements, emphasising the financial dependence of sports organisations on gambling advertising.
This postponement comes after a 2023 parliamentary inquiry, led by the late MP Peta Murphy, unanimously recommended a complete ban on gambling ads. However, internal divisions within the Labor Party have surfaced, with some members advocating for a strict ban while others, including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, favour a more balanced approach.
Opposition and Advocacy Group Responses
Shadow Communications Minister David Coleman criticised the delay, accusing the government of prioritising the interests of sports and media organisations over public welfare. Similarly, the Greens have renewed their call for an outright ban on gambling ads, warning of the social consequences of continued inaction.
Australia’s debate echoes international concerns. In Serbia, for example, the Green Left Front has lobbied for a total ban on gambling advertising, though the government has proposed only partial restrictions, which critics argue are inadequate.
As pressure mounts domestically and abroad, the Australian Government faces growing demands to outline a clear path forward. Advocacy groups continue to emphasise the urgent need to mitigate gambling-related harm, but the timeline for further action remains uncertain.
